Registered User Area
Username

Password

No username/password ?
Sign up here

Lost your password ?

About CECAM
Home 
Welcome 
Mission 
Council 
People 
How to get to
    CECAM Headquarters 


CECAM Prize 

Proposals
Submitting a proposal 

Activities
Workshops 
Tutorials 
Sponsored events 
Symposia 
Visitors Program 

Network
European actions 
Multi-nodal structure 
Openings 
Community 

Useful links
Multimedia 
2008 Workshops 


Common trends between Kinetic theory, Dynamical Density Functional methods and mesoscopic methods based on effective free energy models

October 2, 2008 to October 4, 2008

Location : CECAM-HQ-EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland

 Details
 Participants
 Program
 Abstracts
 

Organisers

  • Simone Melchionna (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)
  • Ignacio Pagonabarraga (Departament de Fisica Fonamental, Universitat de Barcelona)
  • Umberto Marini Bettolo Marconi (Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica)

Supports

   CECAM

   ESF-SimBioMa

Description

In recent years there has been an upsurge of interest towards the study of
non equilibrium phenomena, relaxational problems and transport processes.
Different theoretical approaches have been developed in order to
understand such issues and many results have been obtained.


The behavior of a confined fluid can be different from that
of a bulk fluid in many important aspects. First of all the confinement
induces density inhomogeneities which may determine a variety of
phenomena having no counterpart in bulk systems.
The presence of surfaces, not only alters the average equilibrium
properties of fluids, but also affects their
time-dependent behavior such as diffusion, momentum and energy transport.
As a result, a great effort is currently devoted to the understanding
of fluid physics at the nanoscale.


In the last thirty years, a massive effort has been devoted to the
understanding of systems at thermodynamic equilibrium and new techniques
have been developed, among these Density Functional theory (DFT)
being perhaps the most versatile.
Recently, dynamical generalizations
of these equilibrium methods have been applied to non-equilibrium
problems such as Stokes drift, polymeric fluids confined to cavities
etc.
On the other hand, we do not have a similar control
over the behavior of non equilibrium systems but several
methods have been proposed.

A first community has considered an
approach which can be viewed as an extension of DFT to dynamical problems.
It assumes that the evolution of the microscopic density
is determined by some gradient of the local chemical potential, which
in turn depends on the free energy of the system.
The approach has been tested successfully in the case of colloidal
suspensions and of polymeric solutions,
where the presence of a solvent renders the dynamics dissipative,
and makes the density the only relevant field.

On the contrary, in the case of standard fluids one needs to fully account
for the momentum and energy transport.
The natural procedure seems therefore
to follow the evolution of both
positions and momenta and convey the necessary structural information
into an equation for the phase-space
distribution. Such a task can in principle be achieved
by using a modified Enskog-Boltzmann (EB) approach, as proposed by
different authors.
The Enskog-Boltzmann approach
provides a satisfactory treatment of transport coefficients
and of many non equilibrium problems.
However, the treatment of inhomogeneous systems remains incredibly hard
within this approach. Non uniform solutions of the EB equation can be rarely
obtained. Nevertheless, in recent years a powerful numerical method
has been proposed, namely the Lattice Boltzmann equation (LBE), which
provides the possibility of solving minimal forms of the Boltzmannn
equation under external gradients by using an ingenious discretization
method. Several generalizations of LBE have been proposed to deal
with strongly interacting systems. Among the various versions of the
LBE, the Shan-Chen approach has rapidly gained an important place
because of its versatility, numerical stability and
limited computational effort required.
This success has been obtained at the price of drastic simplifications
concerning the treatment of the microscopic interactions.
Alternatively, some authors have put forward different
proposals but their methods are still the object of
intense debate.


Finally, a third approach has been also fruitfully employed
and consists in deriving the evolution of non uniform fluid systems
from a mesoscopic approach.
The need to use mesoscopic
methods to study the dynamics of complex fluids has lead to the
development of mixed strategies in which a kinetic method, such as LB,
is combined with simplified free energy functionals which allow a
versatile procedure to tune and control the thermodynamics of the
system of interest, incorporating the energy cost of sustaining
interfaces. The development and use of the hybrid schemes has been
based on simple, density gradient functionals. The use of such
approaches at smaller scales, where more detailed description of the
liquid structure may be needed, requires a critical scrutiny. From a
more fundamental point of view, it is also of interest to confront the
connection between such an approach and dynamical density functional
theories.

More recently, alternative hybrid schemes are being developed, in
which a mesoscopic solvent is coupled to an atomistic dynamics for
the solute particles whose trajectories need to be resolved individually. In
these approaches, as for the case of Stochastic Rotation Dynamics,
there is a more microscopic control of the interaction between
molecules coupled to a momentum conserving fluid. Although
usually particle-based mesoscopic approaches display very simple
thermodynamics, there is a on-going effort in providing them with
tunable equilibrium properties. For example, in Dissipative Particle
Dynamics phenomenological proposals close in spirit to density
functional theory have been proposed, and analogous efforts are being
carried out in Stochastic Rotation Dynamics.

Scientific Objectives

The aim of the workshop is to bring together different scientific communities working on similar or contiguous problems and whose common motivation is the
understanding of the dynamics of fluids confined to small systems
or characterized by the presence of fluid interfaces.
The differences in the approaches are determined not only by the nature of systems under scrutiny (colloidal systems have different dynamical behaviors
in comparison with simple fluids), but also from subjective factors
such as the individual scientific background
and personal taste.

References

S. Succi, The Lattice Boltzmann Equation: For Fluid Dynamics and Beyond
(Numerical Mathematics and Scientific Computation Series)
(Oxford University Press, New York, 2001).

Shiyi Chen and Gary D. Doolen
``LATTICE BOLTZMANN METHOD FOR FLUID FLOWS''
Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics
Vol. 30: 329-364 1998

Umberto Marini Bettolo Marconi and Simone Melchionna
``Phase-space approach to dynamical density functional theory''
J. Chem. Phys. 126, 184109 (2007)

X. Shan and H. Chen, Phys. Rev. E 47, 1815 (1993);
49, 2941 (1994).



AJ Archer
``Dynamical density functional theory for dense atomic liquids''
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2006

I.P. and D. Frenkel,
"Dissipative particle dynamics for interacting systems", J.
Chem. Phys. 115, 5015 (2001)

S. Merabia and I.Pagonabarraga. "Density dependent potentials: structure and
thermodynamics", J. Chem. Phys. 127, 054903 (2007)

M. Swift, W. Osborne and J. Yeomans
Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 830 (1995)


R. Evans
Adv. Phys., 28, 143 (1979)

A. Santos, J. M. Montanero, J. W. Dufty, and J. J. Brey
Phys. Rev. E 57, 1644 (1998).

L.-S. Luo
Phys. Rev. E 62, 4982 (2000)



X. He and G.D. Doolen, J. Stat. Phys. 107, 309 (2002)

N.S. Martys
Intl. J. Mod. Phys. 10, 1367 (1999).

H. van Beijeren and M.H. Ernst
Physica (Utrecht) 68, 437 (1973) and 70, 225 (1973).

H.T. Davis
J. Chem. Phys. 86, 1474(1987)

Z. Guo, T. S. Zhao and Y. Shi
Phys. Rev. E 71, 035301(R) (2005)

U. Marini Bettolo Marconi and P. Tarazona
J. Chem. Phys. 110, 8032 (1999).

Pep Espanol and Anero , Europhys. Lett. (2007)


CECAM - Centre Européen de Calcul Atomique et Moléculaire
Station 13, Bat. PPH, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland