Bio-, chem-, and nanoinformatics approaches to study bionano interface

May 23, 2018 to May 25, 2018
Location : CECAM-IRL


  • Vladimir Lobaskin (University College Dublin, Ireland)
  • Tomasz Puzyn (University of Gdansk, Poland)



European Commission H2020, NanoCommons project


With the progress of biomedical and food technologies, the amount of new materials that come in contact with biological fluids and tissues is growing rapidly, and concerns are related but not limited to emerging risks for human health. The questions of biocompatibility of engineered materials arise naturally in respect to medical appliances such as stents, dental and cardiac implants, or prosthetic joints as they can cause immediate hazards upon introduction into the human body.

While microscopic surfaces can be scanned in a lab after exposure to biological fluids, the use of nanomaterials (NM) as implantable materials and components of medical devices poses more sophisticated regulatory challenges. NMs are being explored for a variety of biomedical tasks such as drug delivery, bioimaging, tissue engineering, and biosensors. Beside the medicine, in food industry, complex fluids like milk, protein and sugar mixtures and emulsions experience multiple contacts with engineered materials on the way to the final product and their state can be affected by interface-induced transformations, complexations, or fouling of the surfaces. Finally, common industrial NMs used in household chemistry and cosmetics, automotive and construction materials can cause chronic diseases upon exposure at the workplace.

In all these situations, adverse effects for human health can be triggered and controlled by molecular-level interactions at the biointerface. Understanding of these interactions and biointerface structure is therefore crucial for achieving better control over surface activity, for developing safety regulations, and reducing the associated health risks. Molecular simulation may provide critical tools to solve these problems efficiently.

The latter move faces a number of challenges. A key issue for the simulations is the enormous range of involved time and length scales. Nanoparticle-biointerface systems span lengthscales from the atomistic subnanometer distances (local interactions between amino acids and the surface) to hundreds of nanometers (endocytosis or protein corona). Moreover, protein adsorption and desorption is controlled by strong forces with the corresponding timescales of milliseconds, while the cell membrane rearrangement can take even longer. Finally, the number of biomolecules coming in contact with a NM in any common biological fluid is enormous. A protein corona of a single nanoparticle may contain hundreds of different proteins. For these reasons, the problem can only be addressed using coarse grained models and statistical methods.

Indeed, statistical methods based on nano-, chem- and bioinformatics have recently been successfully applied to toxicological studies. By analyzing the NM and biomolecule descriptors (e.g. surface charge, hydrophobicity, band gap), these methods have helped identify the NM properties of concern and to develop NM fingerprints that correlate well with their biological action. What these properties are in general and how they should be evaluated is the most critical question. A programme to develop nanoinformatics-based approaches is described in the U.S. Roadmap document (Nanoinformatics 2020) and a new EU-US nanoinformatics roadmap is currently being prepared by the community. Moreover, the draft H2020 NMBP programme for 2018-19 includes a call citing nanoinformatics as a crucial tool for addressing the NM safety.

The main goal of the workshop is to outline the progress and required essential steps needed to enable in silico screening of materials for biocompatibility and toxicity using bio-, chem-, and nanoinformatics. The key concept here is the material's descriptor that can quantify the material's biological potency, i.e. its ability to bind or unfold a certain type of molecules, bind cells, produce reactive species, or penetrate biological barriers. The descriptors can be used to construct materials' fingerprints and predictive models (e.g. QSARs) for the NM biological action, to improve NM application efficiency or safety using machine learning techniques.

We will address computational methodologies for systematic evaluation of descriptors, their experimental validation, and construction of databases for bio- and nanomaterials. In particular, the programme will cover the following topics:

• Systematic evaluation of physicochemical properties of common NMs and identification of intrinsic and extrinsic descriptors that determine the complexation of NMs with biomolecules.
• Calculation of advanced descriptors of biomolecules: 3D protein structure, adsorption affinity using molecular simulations
• Construction of predictive models (QSAR) for NM protein corona and for the events at the bionano interface based on NM and biomolecule descriptors using machine learning techniques
• Validation of the models using experiments and detailed simulations
• Development of simulation ontologies, databases of NM properties, read-across and data mining techniques

This event is associated with activities of the EU Nanosafety cluster, European Materials Modelling Council (EMMC) and European Materials Characterisation Council (EMCC).


[1] MA Dobrovolskaia, M Shurin, AA Shvedova, "Current understanding of interactions between nanoparticles and the immune system", Toxicology Applied Pharmacology 299, 78-89 (2016)
[2] MA Dobrovolskaia, “Understanding Nanoparticle Immunotoxicity to Develop Safe Medical Devices”, In “The Immune Response to Implanted Materials and Devices”, ed. B. Coradetti, Springer International Publishing (2017), pp. 63-80
[3] Visser, J; Jeurnink, Th. J. M, "Fouling of Heat Exchangers in the Dairy Industry". Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science. 14, 407–424 (1997).
[4] CD Walkey, JB Olsen, F Song, R Liu, H Guo, DWH Olsen,Y Cohen, A Emili, and WCW Chan, “Protein Corona Fingerprinting Predicts the Cellular Interaction of Gold and Silver Nanoparticles”, ACS Nano 8, 2439–2455 (2014)
[5] P. Kamath, A. Fernandez, F. Giralt, and R. Rallo, “Predicting Cell Association of Surface-Modified Nanoparticles Using Protein Corona Structure - Activity Relationships (PCSAR)” Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 15, 1930 (2015).
[6] SR Saptarshi, A Duschl and AL Lopata, “Interaction of nanoparticles with proteins: relation to bio-reactivity of the nanoparticle”, J Nanobiotechnology 11, 26 (2013).
[7] C Helma, M Rautenberg, D Gebele, "nano-lazar: Read across predictions for nanoparticle toxicities with calculated and measured properties", Frontiers Pharm. 8, 377 (2017)
[8] B Hardy, N Douglas, C Helma, M Rautenberg, N Jeliazkova, V Jeliazkov, "Collaborative development of predictive toxicology applications", J Cheminformatics 2, 7 (2010)
[9] Choi K, Riviere JE, Monteiro-Riviere NA., "Protein corona modulation of hepatocyte uptake and molecular mechanisms of gold nanoparticle toxicity", Nanotoxicology 11, 64-75 (2017). 
[10] Xia XR, Monteiro-Riviere NA, Riviere JE, "An index for characterization of nanomaterials in biological systems", Nature Nanotech. 5: 671-675, 2010.
[11] Chen R, Riviere JE. "Biological surface adsorption index of nanomaterials: modelling surface interactions of nanomaterials with biomolecules", Adv Exp Med Biol 947:207-253, 2017.
[12] de la Iglesia, D. et al, "Nanoinformatics 2020 Roadmap", National Nanomanufacturing Network, USA (2011)
[13] M Ozboyaci, DB Kokh, S Corni, RC Wade, "Modeling and simulation of protein–surface interactions: achievements and challenges", Quarterly Rev. Biophys 49, e4 (2016)
[14] L Shang, K Nienhaus, GU Nienhaus, "Engineered nanoparticles interacting with cells: size matters", J Nanobiotechnol 12, 5 (2014)
[15] S. Wei, and TA Knotts IV. "A coarse grain model for protein-surface interactions", J. Chem. Phys. 139, 095102 (2013)
[16] H Wang, L Shang, P Maffre, S Hohmann, F Kirschhöfer, G Brenner‐Weiß, GU Nienhaus, "The nature of a hard protein corona forming on quantum dots exposed to human blood serum", Small 12 (42), 5836-5844
[17] L Shang, GU Nienhaus, "Metal nanoclusters: Protein corona formation and implications for biological applications", Int. J Biochem & Cell biol. 75, 175-179 (2016)
[18] Schneemilch M, Quirke N, Free energy of adsorption of supported lipid bilayers from molecular dynamics simulation, Chem. Phys. Lett. 664, 199-204 (2016)
[19] Guha and Willighagen, Helping to improve the practice of cheminformatics, J Cheminform 9:40 (2017).
[20] Liu R, Rallo R, Bilal M, Cohen, "Quantitative structure-activity relationships for cellular uptake of surface-modified nanoparticles", Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 18, 365-75 (2015)
[21] T. Puzyn, A. Gajewicz, et al. "Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles", Nature Nanotechnology 6, 175–178 (2011)
[22] H. Lopez, V. Lobaskin, Coarse-grained model of adsorption of blood plasma proteins onto nanoparticles, J. Phys. Chem. 143, 243138 (2015)