Protein Folding: Integrating theory, simulation and experiment
Location: CECAM-ETHZ, Zurich, Switzerland
While the general principles guiding protein folding have now been established [1-3], a complete understanding of folding dynamics at the atomistic level remains an important unsolved challenge . Significant discrepancies between different simulations , and between simulation, theory and experiment  indicate the need for closer communication between these areas. Examples include differences between folding mechanisms predicted by simulations with different energy functions , differences between mechanism deduced from simulations and from experiment [6,7], and the suggestion that the “folding funnel” , a central concept in protein folding theory, may not capture mechanism seen in simulations .
These emerging differences indicate that there are important challenges still to be overcome. Novel experimental and theoretical methods, however, are increasingly promising to bridge this gap; from the simulation side, by being able to tackle longer time scales [10,11], from the theoretical side through the development of more detailed models [12,13], and from the experimental side, by obtaining higher resolution spatial and temporal information [14-17]. In fact, it is precisely because of the development of these methods, that many of the controversial issues mentioned above have been identified. We therefore believe that the time is right for bringing together the leading scientists from each of these areas in order to bridge the gaps between the different disciplines.
Simulation: Advances in computer simulation have of course been driven by the ever-increasing available computer power, now extended to specialized machines for molecular simulation , and the exploitation of low-cost consumer devices (e.g. graphics processing units)  for this purpose. These advances have seen simulations on a microsecond, and even millisecond, time scale becoming possible, making connections with experiment more feasible. In addition, however, recent years have seen the increased use of enhanced sampling methods for extending the accessible range of folding simulations; examples include replica-exchange molecular dynamics (REMD) [19,20] and Markov-State Models [21,22]. While these advances help to solve the sampling problem, inaccuracies in the energy functions used are also becoming evident [23,24]. Recent work in optimizing energy functions has yielded significant improvements to the accuracy of folding simulations [19,25-28]. Notably, many of these advances have been driven by direct comparison with experimental data.
Theory: Early theories of protein folding focused on the qualitative aspects of the problem, i.e. resolving Levinthal’s Paradox, and explaining the origin of cooperative two-state folding in small proteins [3,29,30]. Modern theory seeks to explain experimental observations for specific proteins, ideally in a predictive fashion [13,31]. By constructing simple analytic models for folding, insights may be gained which would be hard to obtain directly from experiments. A particularly promising, but relatively unexploited, area, is the use of such theories to bridge experiment and simulation. Theoretical models are important for interpreting single molecule experiments, allowing the observations to be interpreted in terms of either one-dimensional  or multidimensional  landscapes. In the other direction, theory can assist in the construction of such free energy landscapes and associated dynamics [34-36].
Experiment: New experiments are increasingly yielding quantitative information that can be quantitatively compared with simulation. Ultrafast spectroscopy experiments [16,17,37] on fast-folding proteins and protein fragments provide information on relaxation processes occurring on time scales that can be directly probed by simulation. Single molecule experiments make it possible to study the properties and interconversion of different folded, unfolded and partially folded or misfolded species [38-45]. This removes the problem of ensemble averaging – as a result, comparison with simulation can be much more direct. In addition, single molecule “pulling” experiments allow the energy landscape of proteins to be probed in a different way by application of a mechanical pulling force .
David De Sancho (CIC nanoGUNE) - Organiser & speaker
Benjamin Schuler (University of Zurich) - Organiser
Robert Best (Laboratory of Chemical Physics, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health) - Organiser